Both the O-1 and the EB-1A visa categories recognize foreign nationals with extraordinary ability, and grant you the ability to live and work in the U.S., however they have different benefits and eligibility criteria.
If you’ve achieved exceptional success in your field and are looking to live and work in the United States permanently, the EB-1A green card may be your best path forward.
However, if you are not yet interested in settling in the U.S. permanently, the O-1 visa path may be the better option for you.
If you are doing work that has received national or international acclaim and you’ve reached a level of success that puts you at the top of your field, you may be eligible for an EB-1A or O visa. You could be a researcher with many important citations. A founder, artist, an engineer, an athlete, a doctor. Any field you can think of has its share of extraordinary ability individuals. If you are at the top of your field, it’s worth exploring if you qualify for an Eb-1A or O visa.
Attorney Sharon Lieberman is a business immigration attorney based in New Jersey, who works with clients across New Jersey, New York, all 50 states, and worldwide.
Attorney Sharon Lieberman’s practice centers on EB-1A extraordinary ability petitions, O-1 visas, and responses to Requests for Evidence (RFEs) on cases that were filed by someone else.
On this page
Researchers, engineers, founders, physicians, artists, and athletes can all qualify for EB-1A or O-1 visas, if they have the evidence to prove it.
The clients who succeed in these categories are rarely household names. They are researchers whose work is cited by people they have never met, engineers who built something their industry now relies on, founders whose companies got real coverage, physicians and scientists who peer-review for journals, artists and performers with a documented body of work, and athletes and coaches at a serious competitive level. What they have in common is a record of achievement that can be documented and convincingly argued, and, in the case of O-1 visas, a job offer in hand.
The EB-1A green card is a pathway to U.S. citizenship for people at the top of their field — individuals of extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics.
You can file an EB-1A yourself, without relying on an employer, agent, or needing a labor certification. For that reason it is called “self-petitioning”. That independence is the reason so many people want it — your green card is not tied to an employer’s willingness to keep working with you.
To qualify, you’ll need to show that your work has received “national or international acclaim” and that you’ve reached a level of success that puts you at the top of your field. USCIS decides these petitions, using a set of ten (10) criteria to evaluate EB-1A applicants, that it lists at 8 CFR 204.5(h)(3) . To qualify, you must meet at least three of the ten (3 out of 10) criteria listed below, and pass the USCIS’ “final merits determination”.
Approval is set at a high bar, but for those who qualify, the EB-1A offers one of the fastest, most direct paths to becoming a permanent resident of the United States.
An O-1 visa is a temporary work visa for people of extraordinary ability — renewable indefinitely, but it requires a petitioner, and it is not a pathway to citizenship.
The O-1 comes in two types:
Unlike EB-1A, you cannot file an O-1 for yourself: a U.S. employer or a U.S. agent has to petition or sponsor on your behalf. You need to provide proof of that. An O-1 is granted for an initial period of up to three years, and can be extended in one-year increments with no limit on renewals as long as you still qualify.
It also has a set of criteria and you must qualify for at least three (3) of them.
Often the O-1 first. The EB-1A has a higher evidentiary bar, so many people who qualify for an O-1 are not yet ready for an EB-1A — but the O-1 buys time to build the record.
Other things to consider:
The EB-1A gives you a green card and does not require anyone to sponsor you, but the evidentiary bar is higher, and if you are from India or China, there is a considerably longer wait time for a visa than citizens from other countries. At the same time, the O-1 is faster to obtain and has a slightly less demanding standard, but it is temporary and depends on having a petitioner and proof of work. It’s common to obtain an O-1 to get to the United States and keep working, build up your record of achievement and excellence, and then file the EB-1A at a later time.
As you can see, it depends on your goal and where your current available evidence stands.
For that reason it’s best to book a consultation with a licensed immigration attorney. Attorney Sharon Lieberman can assist. During your consultation we review your evidence and accomplishments and tell you which of the two is better for now, with an eye to what it will take to qualify for an EB-1A down the line, if that’s something you are interested in.
Here’s another quick tool to compare the O-1 vs. EB-1A categories:
| Feature | O-1 | EB-1A |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Nonimmigrant visa, renewable | green card |
| Path to a green card? | No | Yes |
| Employer/sponsor required? | Yes, employer or O-1 agent | No, self-petition |
| Approval rate* | ~91% | ~47.3% |
| Evidentiary standard | O-1A: top of your field. O-1B: a lower “distinction” standard | Top of your field & “sustained national/international acclaim” |
| Country backlog | None | India and China have backlogs |
| Premium processing | Yes, $2,965 | Yes, $2,965 (covers I-140 only) |
| Dependents allowed? | Yes, but spouse/children can't work | Yes, spouse/children get green cards; spouse can work |
| Best use | Enter the U.S. faster for specific work | Settle permanently in the U.S. |
* Approval rate for Q1 FY 2026
** Premium processing and all fees are subject to change without notice; consult USCIS.gov for the latest fees.
There are ten regulatory criteria for EB-1A. You need to satisfy at least three — unless you have won a one-time major international award (like a Nobel Prize, or Olympic gold medal)
The EB-1A criteria are:
If you have won something like a Nobel Prize, an Olympic medal, or an Academy Award, that alone can carry the petition. But this is extremely rare, so almost every case is built on three or more of the criteria above.
Each O-1 category has its own list, and you must meet at least three.
No, and this is the single most misunderstood thing about EB-1As; an EB-1A approval is not just submitting evidence that you’ve met three criteria and receiving an approval in the mail.
In fact, USCIS applies a two-part analysis and something called the Kazarian two-step approval method:
This second step is where most EB-1A applications fail.
Even if you meet three or more criteria, and have the evidence to prove it, you still have to persuade the officer that you are the best of the best, at the very top of your field.
A Request for Evidence (RFE) means USCIS is not yet persuaded; it is not a denial and it is not the end, but you must respond very carefully and correctly.
An RFE asks for more evidence, or for an explanation of evidence you already sent.
On EB-1A cases they are fairly common. Receiving an RFE doesn’t mean you are not extraordinary or that you are being denied, yet. It means that you haven’t quite persuaded USCIS and you are receiving a new opportunity to prove your case.
The instinct is to send more documents, but that’s not always the best way to approach an RFE. And that’s why it’s good to have a qualified immigration attorney to assist in responding to an RFE. Attorney Sharon Lieberman handles RFE responses on cases she filed and on cases that other lawyers filed. She knows strategy, and she can strongly respond to an RFE, either by correctly reframing what is already in the record, or better explaining what your niche is and how your work differs and exceeds what peers in your field are doing.
Yes, don’t despair. Depending on why it was denied, your options can include a motion to reopen or reconsider, an appeal to the AAO, refiling, or federal court litigation — a denial is not always the last word.
Depending on what happened, the options can include a motion to reopen or reconsider, an appeal to the Administrative Appeals Office, refiling with a rebuilt record, or federal court litigation. Which of those next steps makes sense depends entirely on why the case was denied — a denial that misapplies the law is a different problem from a denial that pushed back on a thin record of extraordinary ability.
The first step is reading the decision closely and honestly. Bring it to a consultation with Attorney Sharon Lieberman and you will get a straight assessment, including if the straight assessment is that refiling is a better use of your money than fighting a denial.
With premium processing, USCIS must decide the EB-1A petition within 15 business days, and with regular processing, the wait is considerably longer.
Premium processing is available on EB-1A and O-1 petitions and requires USCIS to act within 15 business days for an additional fee of $2,965.
However, be mindful that the journey to an EB-1A begins much earlier than when you file.
Here’s how the whole application process typically works:
| Phase | What It Is | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Case Building | Gathering evidence: awards, letters, citations, etc. | 6-12 months |
| Case Preparation | Meet with the attorney, develop legal strategy, write the petition, curate the evidence, and final review. | 2-3 months |
| Filing with USCIS | Waiting for a decision after filing. | 15 business days - 22 months (depending on whether you use premium processing or regular processing) to wait for a decision from USCIS. |
Also, remember, an approved petition is not a green card. Whether you can file the final green card application right away depends on your priority date and your country of birth. Applicants born in India or China have historically faced significant delays in this category.
Whether to use premium processing for an EB-1A or O-1 depends on your timeline. If you are on a tight one, for example your OPT is expiring soon or you need quick work or travel authorization, premium processing can offer peace of mind. But it’s pricey, and involves an additional $2,965 fee.
On the other hand, if you’re not in a rush, for example you’re still in valid visa status that is not expiring soon, regular processing may work for you.
Generally faster than an EB-1A — and with premium processing, USCIS must decide the O-1 petition within 15 business days. A consultation with an immigration attorney will give you a realistic picture for your specific situation.
Usually yes, but it depends on the status you already hold.
Filing an EB-1A petition does not by itself give you the right to stay or work. Whether you can remain, keep working, and travel depends on your current status — H-1B, O-1, F-1, or something else — and on when you become eligible to file the final green card application. This is the part of the process where people get into trouble by accident, and it is worth mapping out before you file, not after.
You can, but it’s not advisable.
A successful EB-1A is not just about submitting paperwork, it’s about refining a smart strategy, thoughtfully curating your evidence, drafting a studied and intentional petition and anticipating what USCIS will push back on. An experienced immigration attorney, who is licensed to practice in the U.S., focuses on business immigration, especially EB-1A petitions and RFE responses, is your best resource.
Be cautious with non-attorney services that promise EB-1A approvals.
There has been a huge uptick in non-attorney EB-1A profile building services. These are people or companies who are non-attorneys, and market themselves as expert profile builders who can help you build EB-1A, O-1A, or NIW cases. They have big marketing budgets, sleek advertisements, and offer free online questionnaires and evidence checklists.
Some of them offer a few free templates, and promise that if you sign up for their services they will get you an approval. Their fees can be quite high, often more than what an attorney charges.
If you are considering a profile building service, we strongly recommend you use caution before you work with anyone who is not an attorney.
Non-attorneys can put together checklists, but they do not understand the legal elements of each criterion, what evidence actually proves them, and, increasingly, what USCIS is NOT legally entitled to require.
The last part is important now that more than ever.
Applicants are receiving RFEs or Notices of Intent to Deny letters. These are often based on USCIS wrongly reading and interpreting the law. When USCIS improperly reads the law, and issues an improper Request for Evidence, these profile building services are of limited use and an attorney is typically required to step in.
Worse still, some of these services sell access to questionable evidence that can jeopardize your entire EB-1A filing. USCIS is increasingly being trained to spot fraud: things like inflated citation metrics, predatory scientific journals with lax publishing standards, and bought-for media exposure or expert letters. A fraud finding, or a red flag in your application, will follow you and can result in a permanent finding of inadmissibility that is difficult to overcome.
Be very careful working with anyone who is not a licensed immigration attorney.
By building your EB-1A or O-1 case the way the USCIS officer will read it — and by telling you honestly if you are not ready to file.
The EB-1A petition process is complex, and even the strongest candidates can get tripped up by how detailed and strict the requirements are. Knowing how to present your evidence, anticipating where USCIS will push back, monitoring trends and key metrics is what an experienced business immigration attorney does.
Attorney Sharon Lieberman knows how USCIS officers interpret the criteria, what kind of documentation makes the biggest impact, and how to anticipate their questions or concerns. She has a strong track record, and has worked with tech professionals on shaping winning strategies.
Attorney Sharon Lieberman is admitted in New York and New Jersey and practices business immigration with a focus on extraordinary ability cases. She drafts EB-1A petitions and RFE responses regularly and has a strong record of approval.
She recently discussed EB-1A denials, Administrative Appeals Office decisions, and litigation strategy for denied cases on a top immigration podcast.
Consultations are available in English, French, and Russian.
Attorney Sharon Lieberman is an experienced and highly rated immigration lawyer. Working with a skilled immigration lawyer can offer you reassurance and a higher chance of success. At Lieberman Law Group, we’re passionate about our clients, work to make sure your EB-1A or O-1 visa application is as strong as possible, and will support you every step of the way.
A consultation will tell you where your evidence actually stands against the criteria, whether O-1 or EB-1A is the realistic path right now, and what would need to be built before filing. If the honest answer is that you are not ready yet, you will hear that too — filing a weak petition is an expensive way to find out.
Disclaimer: The information on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading this page or contacting Lieberman Law Group does not create an attorney-client relationship; an attorney-client relationship is formed only through a signed engagement agreement.
New Jersey
Lieberman Law Group
2 University Plaza, Suite 100,
Hackensack, NJ 07601
New York
Lieberman Law Group
1 Blue Hill Plaza, Suite 1509,
Pearl River, NY 10965
T: (551) 209-1906
admin@liebermanlawgroup.com